Skip to content
March 30, 2010 / gus3

SCO Doubled Down, and Lost Again

After seven-plus years, four trials, a verdict, and an appeal, SCO has once more proven to be a great big, fat


in their own shell-game they tried to play against Novell.

First, a judge told them they had no case, and now a jury has done the same. That’s twice that SCO got their “day in court” to tell what they thought Amendment 2 of the Asset Purchase Agreement was “supposed to say,” and nobody has believed them. It’s kind of difficult to make a case about “should have been” when the signed and executed paperwork is on exhibit in the case.

Up next: SCO is converted from reorganization bankruptcy to termination. Well, one can hope…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: